|
Services
/ Environmental
Management / Confluence
Newsletter
Confluence: June 2002, Vol. 4, No. 4
In Focus
Mountaintop Mining
The White House could soon enact a rule change in the Clean
Water Act. The new rule would allow mining companies and others
to bury water bodies under piles of waste. Coal companies
seeking relief from restrictive environmental regulations
are hoping to continue the practice of dumping waste from
mountaintop coal mining. Environmental organizations are lobbying
against the rule change and have recently won a major court
case before a federal district court blocking implementation
of the change.
The specific rule at issue is the Army Corp of Engineers'
definition of the "fill" material dumped into waters
and wetlands. The current rules say that "fills"
- which are activities the Corps can permit under the Clean
Water Act - cannot consist of waste. The new definition, however,
would say that "any material that has the effect of replacing
portions of waters with dry land or changing the bottom elevation
of a water body" is permissible for use as "fill".
This expansion of the definition would allow the Corps to
permit waste dumping into US waters.
The Clinton Administration proposed the change in the "fill"
definition under the Clean Water Act two years ago in order
to allow the waste from mountaintop removal coal mining to
be dumped into streams. More than 17,000 public comments protested
the rule changes during the public comment period in the spring
of 2000. Due to the public outcry, the Clinton Administration
decided against finalizing the proposal. Now, the Bush Administration
is prepared to reverse that decision.
A reversal would mean that any industry could throw their
waste into a stream, wetland, or river as long as they have
a permit or approval from the Corps. It will be permissible
to dump millions of tons of coal waste, hardrock mining waste,
and other types of harmful wastes into US streams, rivers,
lakes, and wetlands if the rule change is allowed to occur.
Groups such as American
Rivers (http://www.americanrivers.org) are opposing the
rule change.
Forward>>
<<Back
Table of Contents
|